flashing ticker
To interact with this page you must login.      Signup

Why should we require high school students to study subjects in which they have no interest? Why not allow them to choose the disciplines they want to study, i.e., to focus their studies in an area that interests them?

We force them to take courses they hate and will never use, which seems like a vast waste of resources.
spacer
categorysociety
typeunderstand
tynamite
tynamite's avatar Vocational subjects like Art, Music, PE, Technology, Food, and Citizenship that teach no academic skills, provide escapism for children, and they allow children to have better grades in school because those "fun" subjects exist.

I believe that for certain years at school, the years are a waste of learning, like for example in the UK, Key Stage 3 which lasts for three years. What the government can't do, is end mandatory education three years earlier, leaving kids with employment prospects as they're minors, so they use those years to fill up their heads up with rubbish.
report this post permalink
What's an assertion, and what should I type in?

Compesh is a question and answer (and debate) website, so before you make a debate, you better learn what an assertion is. I suppose you already know what a question is, and that you've typed it in the box. ;)

An assertion, is basically a statement you can make, that is either true or false.

Richer people have better health.

The question for that would be, Do richer people have better health?

And don't forget to make your assertion, match your question.

Compesh logo