To interact with this page you must login.
Signup
How would you add game mechanics or gamification to the Senate / Congress / Parliament?
And what would be the benefits?
society
everyone
Compesh is a question and answer (and debate) website, so before you make a debate, you better learn what an assertion is. I suppose you already know what a question is, and that you've typed it in the box. ;)
An assertion, is basically a statement you can make, that is either true or false.
Richer people have better health.
The question for that would be, Do richer people have better health?
And don't forget to make your assertion, match your question.
Claiming 1p for a flapjack? 39p for a paperclip? Claiming 1p phone bills? That is taking the piss! Come on, that is just a pisstake! They're taking us taxpayers for fools. If that's not extortion, I don't know what is.
Just by being a British member of parliament, you already win the game by default, which is why you can claim loads of prizes/winnings/rewards.
However the expense game does have rules, and you can lose. You see the game is to win as much swag as possible, without having a game over. You can have a game over by either going to prison for fraud (by lying about your circumstances on your claim form) or getting outed and then losing your job. If you get your claim rejected, you lose a match, but can play again.
LMAO
MPs who won the match
Gordon Brown.
Source for this: http://mps-expenses.guardian.co.uk/page/91/
If you thought Gordon Brown was bad, wait until you hear this?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5349413/MPs-expenses-Full-list-of-Labour-MPs-investigated-by-the-Telegraph.html
MPs who lost the match (got their claim rejected)
Hmm wait a minute! How come Peter Luff wasn't allowed to claim an expense for a telephone bill, but ex Prime Minister, Gordon Brown could (see image above), and get his accepted? Huh? It seems like the enforcements for expenses are lax - sometimes enforced, sometimes lenient.
I suppose it is thrilling to make bets about which one of your friends will get their expense claims under £1 approved. John Robertson tries it too. Damn! These MPs don't pay their bills do they?
MPs who got game over (got sacked due to public outcry or put in prison for fraud)
^^ I detect a conflict of interest. ^^
^^^^ Awww! His claim for a duck house got rejected as well before that! I suppose someone doesn't want him to have a ducky wucky house. *cries* ^^^^
However, can you truly lose the game? The answer is that you can't, because the legal system in Britian favours the upper class. (I typed "expenses prison" into Google, and this is what came up. I didn't mean to find these cases of early release.
====
All information about MPs expenses, was retrieved using the Freedom of Information Act, which obliges public services and government departments to disclose information, of which would be of public interest to know about, on request.
Here's an article from Libertarian newspaper The Guardian, which explains the importance of a free press (freedom of the press), in regards to expenses and other such things up top.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/oct/06/importance-free-press-alan-rusbridger
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/mps-expenses
http://mps-expenses.guardian.co.uk/